Medical leaders, such as deans, educators, and chief executive officers (CEOs) and their personnel, are constantly challenged in the existing health environment to achieve conflicting goals of quality healthcare and cost containment. The performance expectations are visible in all aspects of the medical system, including healthcare institutions and research hospitals, as well as their clinical manifestations practices.
Undoubtedly, the difficulties may be even greater in these institutions because they share additional research and education commitments that complicate patient care delivery even more. These expectations necessitate incredibly advanced management approaches to achieve superior results in all areas.
Chief Medical Officers play vital roles in the healthcare sector. They are healthcare professionals and leaders who play an essential role in providing exceptional patient care and can significantly affect the overall effectiveness of their healthcare institutions. CMO is a common position in the healthcare, bioscience, and pharmaceutical industry. However, as a result of the pandemic’s evolving healthcare needs, the CMO role has received increased attention.
Having a senior executive with expertise in healthcare and human resources will help ensure your policies are effectively communicated and enforced. A CMO does more than just coordinate its subordinates’ testing, preventive care, and contact tracing; these are tasks that most human resource managers can handle. CMOs better understand all health information within their organisation, which benefits both their employees and the communities in which they work. This exchange of pertinent information will aid in the development of better healthcare schemes that will support more people in their communities.
CMOs have internal and external influence because of the role’s unique characteristics: they are traditionally placed to protect public health by contributing to government policy and decision-making procedures and communicating directly to community members about health issues. At the same time, while CMOs are usually advisors to cabinet members and administrative assistants of health, their clear responsibilities form their power to influence policy decisions, their functional connectivity to the minister, and the extent to which their recommendation filters through other ministry or department representatives. The responsibilities of CMOs are also in conflict with one another, as they frequently try to balance competing responsibilities to the government, the public health and medical communities, and the general public.
They assess their ethical obligations as healthcare professionals and leaders who may be projected to endorse public health against the need to preserve trustable and cooperative working relationships with elected representatives in order to influence decision-making (which, for some, includes the expectation that they act as a critic of government choices). They must also faithfully describe the government’s decision-making to the media and community members while keeping public confidence in the information they find.
Due to severe financial and regulatory restrictions, the medical field has evolved into a turbulent environment; as a result, medical professional determination and basic competence are more important than ever in order to continue providing social health promotion. The medical leader provides an appropriate atmosphere for the professional well-being of the workforce, particularly physicians. Given that these issues reflect the core of the organisational constitution, the medical officer is accountable for creating and enhancing the founding policy, protocols, and procedures. Furthermore, healthcare leaders must directly supervise or assign medical commissions responsible for the operations in the healthcare industry.
Ideally, the healthcare leader is willing to take responsibility for any process that may interfere directly or indirectly with the quality of the healthcare services; he or she must foster cooperation among medical departments, doctors, healthcare workers, and other working personnel; and finally, the medical leaders make themselves available and proficient of monitoring and assessing any acute failure in any medical unit within the relatively short reasonable time.
