Factories are expanding, and FDI is pouring in as India advances toward becoming the world’s third-largest economy. Make in India 2.0 is being positioned as the final leap toward Atmanirbharta. Make in India 1.0 had already delivered measurable gains. India climbed from 81st to 63rd in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business rankings, attracted over $420 billion in FDI between 2014 and 2021, and boosted manufacturing GVA from $220 billion to nearly $270 billion.
However, behind the glossy PLI brochures and grand inauguration ceremonies lies a crisis few dare to acknowledge: India’s ambition to become the world’s manufacturing hub is colliding with a water supply already over 75% depleted and an unstable electric grid that threatens to undermine the entire vision. This challenge isn’t a distant 2050 risk but a clear and present danger for 2025–2030. Yet almost no one in Lutyens’ Delhi or the state secretariats is willing to say it aloud.
Table of Contents
The Thirsty Miracle
Every smartphone, every EV battery, every data centre, every green hydrogen molecule we want to manufacture needs obscene amounts of water. A single semiconductor fab guzzles 10–20 million litres per day, more than a mid-sized city. One large lithium-ion battery gigafactory needs 1–2 million litres per GWh of capacity every single day. Data centres, also known as the backbone of “Digital India,” consume 18,000 litres of water per MW of IT load for cooling alone.
But the script of Aatmanirbharta completely contradicts the manufacturing efficiency. Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Telangana, the very states competing to attract the next Foxconn, Tata, or Micron, are already in severe water distress.
Chennai ran dry in 2019. Bengaluru’s lakes are sewage pits. Marathwada farmers commit suicide when the monsoon fails. These are not just cases of failures, but is the testament that the establishment of water-intensive electronics and semiconductor manufacturing facilities in India is facing significant challenges due to existing water scarcity yet the announcement of new electronics clusters and “semicon cities” makes no sense.
The Grid That Cannot Carry the Dream
Make in India 2.0 quietly projects an additional 500–600 GW of new power demand by 2040, mainly driven by industry. This represents a new India, separate from the current one. However, our transmission infrastructure is aging, substations are overloaded, and intra-state bottlenecks are well known.
When Tata considered building a plant in Tamil Nadu, the state modestly acknowledged it could not guarantee 24×7 reliable power for the next five years. Similar issues are seen in Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Andhra Pradesh. Renewables seem promising, but solar power drops to zero precisely at 6 p.m., when factories transition to second shifts. Battery storage? India has less than 100 MWh installed now, while the 2030 goal is over 200 GWh. This significant gap is worrisome as India aims to boost manufacturing efficiency, but these challenges are hindering its progress.
The Invisible Trade-Off Nobody Wants to Admit
To build a ₹50,000 crore chip manufacturing plant, we need 2,000–3,000 MLD of fresh water and 500–800 MW of dependable power. Most states can fulfill these needs only by reallocating resources from other sectors or farmers. However, farmers face a difficult process: protests, political risks, and the dangers involved dissuade investors, damaging the state’s reputation and jobs. Consequently, everyone remains silent, signs MoUs, inaugurates, and relies on hope for a monsoon and grid upgrades that rarely occur.
The Global Race We Are Sleepwalking Into
While India celebrates each new factory announcement, our competitors openly acknowledge their resource limitations. Taiwan is recycling 85–90% of industrial water and rapidly building desalination plants. Vietnam is securing its river basins years ahead.
The UAE is paying Europe to host its data centers, aware of its water and power shortages. Meanwhile, India remains divided over providing free electricity to farmers while simultaneously offering the same to companies like Apple and Tesla.
A New Realism or a Slow-Motion Train Wreck?
Make in India 2.0 can still be successful, but only if we stop viewing water and energy as mere “infrastructure issues” to be addressed later. Instead, they should be seen as strategic resources more valuable than semiconductor nodes.
We need a National Water-for-Industry Mission with statutory authority, even overriding state concerns when national security-grade manufacturing is involved. All new large projects should comply with mandatory zero-liquid-discharge and 90% recycling norms without exceptions or delays.
Establishing a Transmission Superhighway Corporation that can cut through land and bureaucracy, as China did with high-speed rail, is crucial. Additionally, honest public dashboards should display exactly how much water and firm power each state can supply, preventing investor misconceptions. Most importantly, we need political consensus that sacrifices some populist ideals, such as free farm power and summer tariffs, to achieve industrial dominance.
The Final Warning
History will judge harshly if Make in India 2.0 turns into the world’s largest industrial graveyard, with half-finished factories abandoned by investors who later realize that while land was cheap, water and power were scarce. We have the engineers, entrepreneurs, and market; what we lack is time. The water table is dropping, the grid is strained, and competitors are moving quickly. If we continue discussing this crisis in secret rather than loudly and clearly, we will create nothing but an illusion of progress.
