Since AI systems are now a big part of ordinary business workflows, responsible AI governance is no longer just a theoretical concern. Because of progress in AI, the importance and risks of Generative AI models and similar technologies are at an all-time high. Due to recent developments, the Chief AI Ethics Officer (CAIEO) position is now getting a lot of attention. Or is it not reasonable to ask every company to have one?
Table of Contents
Responsible AI Is On The Rise
AI impacts economies, influences behaviour, and enables choices otherwise impossible. This power creates issues: biases in algorithms, data misuse, hard-to-justify decisions, and ethical lapses that harm a company’s reputation, worsen inequality, and break rules.
A 2024 Deloitte survey revealed that 62% of global firms are rapidly adopting AI, yet only 38% have formal AI ethics frameworks. This has prompted a re-evaluation of racism. Investors, regulators, and consumers demand more responsibility from AI-using businesses.
In 2023, McKinsey noted that unethical AI is primarily a leadership issue, not just a technological one. Consequently, organisations prioritise governance over technical compliance, elevating the role of the Chief AI Ethics Officer.
The argument for a Chief AI Ethics Officer
A CAIEO role was developed due to three pressures:
1. Governments are proposing new laws to safeguard against unethical AI. The EU’s AI Act enforces strict oversight and risk classification for AI systems. The Biden administration’s “Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights” demands transparency, fairness, and human alternatives to AI decisions.
2. Ethical AI affects how customers perceive companies. Trust can quickly erode when hiring or face recognition systems are seen as biased. A CAIEO guides decisions to protect the brand’s image.
3. Accountability to Stakeholders: Employees, investors, and customers now expect companies to be more accountable. Unethical actions can lead to employee turnover, shareholder demands for change, and customer avoidance. Leading in ethics signifies commitment to corporate responsibility.
EY’s 2024 Future of Trust study shows that firms with a dedicated AI ethics function achieve up to 25% higher stakeholder trust scores.
What Duties Could a Chief AI Ethics Officer Handle?
CAIEOs must fulfil duties beyond mere compliance or advice. Engineering requires detailed planning, encompasses various topics, and involves significant teamwork. Typical roles include:
- Policy Creation: Developing and enforcing AI ethics policies that align with legal and moral standards.
- Overseeing Functions: Working with legal, product, engineering, HR, and marketing teams to ensure ethical aspects are integrated into company offerings.
- Risk Evaluation: Assessing the risks of AI applications to identify critical areas and ensuring appropriate defences are in place.
- Training Programmes: Establishing and leading ethics training for all staff.
- Mediation: Connecting the business with regulators, academic institutions, and civil organisations.
The CAIEO should be able to work with technology, ethics, policy and issues related to organisations.
Issues and Things to Consider
Although the case appears clear, setting up a CAIEO can be difficult in some ways:
- It is important that the role wields authority and is represented in meetings, not just used to represent the company publicly.
- Most organisations currently have people in the positions of Chief Data Officers (CDOs), Chief Risk Officers (CROs) or Chief Compliance Officers (CCOs). Determining what the study will include and which questions are unnecessary is very important.
- Finding experts who can handle difficult technologies while acting ethically is not easy. KPMG found that less than 5% of AI-related jobs focus on ethical matters, meaning insufficient attention is given to developing ethical talent.
Global Momentum
Despite barriers, progress is evident. Salesforce, Microsoft, and IBM have begun appointing ethical leaders with legal, technological, and philosophical expertise. Pharma Nexus’ 2025 AI in Life Sciences report notes that 78% of life sciences leaders believe ethical oversight should be the board’s responsibility.
Additionally, Harvard Business Review indicates that strong ethics can enhance innovation and support competitive success.
Would Appointing One Improve a Company’s Performance?
Not necessarily. The decision to construct a CAIEO relies on several considerations.
- Heavy Rely on AI: Businesses that depend mostly on AI for their daily duties or customer engagement are excellent opportunities.
- Companies in industries covered by extensive regulations (healthcare, finance, public services) must be extra accountable.
- A good reputation can be vital for firms that deal directly with clients, so ethical oversight matters more to them.
Even if they are not large, organisations can help by assigning the task of overseeing AI ethics to senior staff or at least to a special officer.
Developments in Corporate Ethics Leadership
Ethics in leadership will increasingly differentiate companies as AI transforms industries. When ethical practices are core to operations and leadership exemplifies this, companies manage oversight effectively, embrace innovation, and gain public trust.
Even with machines influencing decisions, individuals must depend on their moral compass. A CAIEO and a systematic approach to ethics require AI accountability at the highest levels.
Confusion regarding ethics in AI is now outdated. Is your business prepared to lead in the industry?
