On August 22, 1944, the Soviet Union’s Red Army broke through the Jassy in northeastern Romania. It was a critical point in World War II that reshaped Romania’s future. This occupation was not just a military operation but a significant geopolitical event with far-reaching consequences.
Romania’s journey to Soviet occupation began years before the Red Army arrived. In the late 1930s, Romania was ruled by King Carol II, who struggled to maintain control amidst rising fascist influences. By 1940, Romania had allied itself with Nazi Germany, hoping to protect its borders and strengthen far-right groups within the country. However, this alliance came at a high cost, as Nazi forces heavily exploited Romania’s resources, and once the tides of war shifted, the country became a battleground.
By 1944, with Germany on the defensive and the Soviet Union advancing, Romania found itself in a dangerous position. King Michael I, who had taken the throne after his father’s abdication, saw an opportunity to change the course of his nation’s history.
Table of Contents
A Strategic Move
The Soviet occupation convinced King Michael to sign a ceasefire with the Allies and concede control of Romania to the USSR. The king’s decision was driven by a desire to save his country from further destruction and align with the war’s winning side. The Red Army’s breakthrough was swift and decisive. By September 12, 1944, the Moscow Armistice was signed, formalising the Romanian surrender and its new status as a Soviet-occupied territory. The Red Army’s presence in Romania would last until 1958, peaking at around 615,000 personnel in 1946.
Political and Social Turmoil
The Soviet occupation brought significant political changes to Romania. King Michael I, who had hoped to save his nation, was forced to resign in 1947, and a communist government was installed. This new regime, heavily influenced by Moscow, began a series of radical reforms to transform Romania into a socialist state. The Iron Guard, a fascist paramilitary organisation that had terrorised Romania for years, was disassembled. However, this did not bring peace. Instead, the country faced new forms of repression under the communist government. Political disagreements were crushed, and many Romanians were imprisoned or executed for opposing the new government.
The Socio-Economic Impact and Transformation
The socio-economic impact of the Soviet occupation was profound and long-lasting. The Soviet presence further disrupted Romania’s economy, which had already been strained by years of war. The Soviets established “SovRoms,” joint Soviet-Romanian companies that controlled major industries and drained Romania’s resources. War compensation to the Soviet Union further drained the nation’s wealth. Agriculture, the backbone of Romania’s economy, was collectivised, leading to widespread disruption and hardship for rural communities. The focus shifted to heavy industry, following the Soviet model of rapid industrialisation. Consequently, the extensive central planning and state control suffocated innovation and efficiency. Despite these challenges, Romania did experience some economic growth during the early years of communist rule. By the 1950s, the country had gradually begun to recover. The emphasis on heavy industry led to the development of new factories and infrastructure, which provided jobs and boosted production. However, this growth was uneven and often came at the expense of the population’s well-being.
A New World Order
The Soviet occupation of Romania was part of a broader strategy to establish Soviet influence in Eastern Europe, and many historians claim it was the beginning of the Cold War Era. As Eastern Europe fell under the control of communist forces aligned with Moscow, the division of Europe into Eastern and Western blocks would shape global politics for decades to come.
Romania’s legacy of Soviet occupation was mixed. The country eventually broke free from Soviet control in 1958, but the years of occupation left deep scars. The communist forces remained in power until 1989, and the transition to democracy and a market economy was full of difficulties.
