Why India’s MSMEs Are Stuck in Survival Mode Despite the $5 Trillion Economy Dream 

A sector that employs more than 110 million and contributes almost 30% of GDP, Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) are the key to India achieving a 5-trillion-economy. On record, they are being hailed as the drivers of growth, manufacturing, and exports. But on the ground, a reality other than this takes shape. The MSMEs in industrial clusters and small towns are no longer concerned with scaling or innovating; their main concern is survival. Their situation is characterised by weak cash flows, low margins and constant uncertainty. India is not scaling down its macroeconomic aspirations or appreciating the microeconomic plight of small businesses, as has been pointed out in numerous policy papers by Drishti IAS and BusinessWorld, but, on the contrary, it is broadening them.

When Promised Growth, Cash Never Flows

The worst problem experienced by MSMEs is delayed payments. Approximately by March 2024, it will be approximately Rs. Drishti IAS reports and data from the Ministry of MSMEs indicate that 7.34 lakh crore is tied up in unpaid receivables owed by big corporations and government agencies to MSMEs. Delays in payment pose great difficulties for small businesses that operate on a tight margin; they can be lethal.

Unpaid invoices of 90, 120 or even 180 days can usually force MSMEs to resort to informal credit markets, where interest rates can be as high as 30 or 60 per cent per annum. Economist Arun Kumar refers to this as systemic exploitation through delays in interviews, as quoted by policy think tanks, and large buyers have effectively turned MSMEs into their interest-free lenders. Though payments should be made within 45 days, execution remains low, making the legal protections a piece of paper.

The Credit Gap That Won’t Go

Access to formal finance is the second critical fault line. Policy briefs reviewed by BusinessWorld quote estimates of unmet credit demand of around Rs in the MSME sector in India. 25 lakh crore. Micro-enterprises are the most impacted, family-owned, informal, and under-capitalised businesses.

Banks depend on collateral and credit history, which is not the case for most MSMEs. Although the number of MSME credits is increasing, the gains are enjoyed by larger companies, leaving micro and small entities at the mercy of informal lenders. Such credit gap prevents the growth, technology upgrading and capacity expansion of the MSMEs, keeping them in low-product cycles.

Shock in the World, Suffering in the Neighbourhood

Export-oriented MSMEs have been subjected to external environmental stress. Small exporters struggle with supply chain disruptions, geopolitical tensions, and protectionist measures. The recent tariffs of up to 50% in the US under the 25-year-old tariffs have resulted in cancelled orders, renegotiated contracts, and reduced margins for Indian MSMEs, according to Drishti IAS.

MSMEs do not have a financial buffer or market diversification to absorb such shocks as compared to large exporters. In his presentations on India’s competitive trade environment, economist Biswajit Dhar says that MSMEs are usually Tier-2 or Tier-3 suppliers and thus are not price-setters but price-takers. They are the first to suffer losses in the event of a global demand shrinkage or a tariff increase.

In a Fragmented Policy Landscape, Compliance Overload

Even in the case of demand, regulatory complexity hinders competitiveness. MSMEs have to navigate a maze of conflicting labour laws, GST laws, environmental approvals, and state legislation, in most cases without dedicated compliance departments. A BusinessWorld survey finds that duplicating policies across MSME schemes has weakened them and, instead of providing clarity, has created confusion.

In the case of micro-enterprises, the time taken to fill the returns or to act on the notices is a time wasted in production, sales, or innovation. The compliance cost is a sort of regressive tax that affects smaller firms more than larger, better-endowed firms. Policy researcher Anil Bhardwaj believes that MSMEs do not require more schemes, but rather simpler ones.

Finding themselves in the Technology Gap

A significant percentage of Indian MSMEs still use old machinery, are not highly digitalised and are poorly automated. As assessments mentioned in Drishti IAS point out, the lack of technology and skills is a major obstacle to productivity. A lack of digital adoption, trained staff, and knowledge of Industry 4.0 practices means that many companies find it challenging to fit into the new value chains.

This is a vicious cycle: low productivity breeds low margins, which further deter investment in skills and technology, thereby continuing to stagnate. Unless special attention is paid to skilling and modernisation of technology, MSMEs will be left forever behind in the fast-changing economy.

There is a Gap Between Policy Promises and Ground Reality

The government has realised the existence of these forces, and the Union Budget 2025-26 has declared a number of measures. These are raising the credit guarantee cover by increasing the amount of cover by Rs. 5 crore to Rs. 10 crore, introducing a Rs. 5 lakh tailor-made credit card for micro-enterprises registered under Udyam, and injecting funds of Rs. Invested 5,000 crore of equity in SIDBI in order to increase its lending power. The MSME Samadhaan Portal has also been upgraded to better address the issue of delayed payments.

Despite these actions, their effects are not even, as cited experts in Drishti IAS and BusinessWorld argue. The lack of rigid implementation of payment timelines, faster dispute resolution, and special attention to MSMEs affected by exports is likely to continue to put the country under financial strain until 2026 and beyond.

The 5 Trillion Question MSMEs are whining

The MSMEs are resilient, have ideas and entrepreneurial spirit. What they lack is a system that will give them the chance to breathe. As long as credit gaps are not bridged, compliance will be complicated and technological assistance will be piecemeal; MSMEs will still face difficulties surviving.

The macro indicators in themselves cannot boost the economy to the target of reaching the $5 trillion. It will be constructed or demolished in workshops, factories, and small offices where entrepreneurs decide daily whether to invest, borrow, or close down. Until the policies change their approach of announcing schemes to enhance implementation, small businesses in India will continue to ask an unasked but critical question: How can we build the future when we are still floundering in the present?

Leave a Reply